Support Rationale for Pakistan Business Council’s 8-Point Agenda on the Economy
Immediate moratorium on new trade agreements, including ones with Turkey and Thailand; renegotiate existing to Pakistan’s advantage.
Immediate moratorium on new trade agreements, including ones with Turkey and Thailand; renegotiate existing to Pakistan’s advantage. Besides net positive trade flow, FTAs must deliver three key objectives:
A comprehensive 3-year rolling trade strategy with full support from all line ministries; PM to oversee its implementation. Aim is to position Pakistan on par with Vietnam, etc. Should address all impediments to value addition, incl. import integration and the revival of units closed due to energy shortage and influx of cheap imports under FTAs and PTAs.
Integral part of CPEC should be attracting jobs displaced in China, esp. in textiles, due to rising labour cost. Concessions in SEZ’s be conditional on jobs and exports incremental to, and not at the cost of, existing industry
CPEC will no doubt be a game changer for Pakistan and there is hardly a facet of the economy that will not be touched by it. However, there needs to be greater transparency on how CPEC will impact the competiveness of existing domestic industries and the safeguards that will be deployed to prevent it becoming a channel for cheap imports. This is a concern as reportedly industries established in Special Economic Zones under CPEC will enjoy extensive concessions. It is important to ensure that such ventures add incrementally to jobs and exports and don’t displace existing sources in the country. Pakistan should leverage CPEC to attract a meaningful percentage of the millions of jobs that are likely to move out of China given the rising labor and conversion cost there. Indeed that should be an integral part of CPEC. Pakistan will have to service the CPEC debt and equity. It is estimated that it would amount to between $3 Bn to $5 Bn pa starting in a few years. Only if Pakistan is able to generate export earnings would that become possible. So far there is a general reluctance to look the CPEC gift horse in the mouth; the domestic industries’ fear is that it could turn out to be a Trojan horse! This needs to be allayed.
Provide Industry access to energy, water and labor at regionally comparable costs, failing which, implement the export package to prevent further loss of market share. Use the exchange rate tool wisely.
Provision of electricity and gas at a competitive cost is an issue broader than just to sustain exports. Supply of energy to domestic industry at globally competitive rate helps in withstanding the onslaught of imports. Pakistan’s value-added export sector is encumbered by energy costs that are 60% to 100% higher and an exchange rate that has been adjusted the least vs. most competitors:
Factor | Pakistan | China | India | Bangladesh | Vietnam |
Energy (c/KWH) | 14.25 | 8.5 | 9 | 113 | 7 |
Min. Wage $/M | 133 | 150-320* | 115-135* | 68 | 107-156* |
Cur. +/- vs US$ since Jul’15 | -2.93% | -11.35% | -6.19% | -1.06% | -4.19% |
Cur. +/- vs Euro since Jul’15 | +0.89% | -7.21% | -2.25% | +3.05% | -0.66% |
The cost disparity between Pakistan and Bangladesh is between 1.3 to 2.7 times:
Pakistan | Bangladesh | Pak/BD Mult. | |
Energy -Electricity US$/KWH -Gas US$/KWH -Steam US$/Hour |
0.145 0.27 16.27 |
0.11 0.12 6.75 |
1.34 2.7 2.47 |
Labour US$/M -Min Wage -Total incl overtime and social security |
133 223 |
68 97 |
1.98 2.29 |
The government’s package to support value-added exports should be implemented as soon as possible to stem loss of market share. In the broader context, the narrative on energy must now shift from generation and supply to cost.
Urgently address FBR’s talent and technology gaps; curb Its discretionary powers, promote an environment which encourages expansion of the tax base. Its KPI must be weighted to taxes collected from new taxpayers. Stop mistrusting the formal sector; reward it for acting as a collection agent. Taxation needs to be equitable and competitive and promote capital accumulation/consolidation to build scale and competiveness.
Government’s own deficit target and the target it sets the FBR for tax collection do not differentiate between taxes raised from existing and new tax payers. This drives the FBR to extract more from the already taxed, sometimes through actions bordering on harassment and others that risk long term health of business. Indeed harassment is the biggest turn-off for those not already in the tax base. FBR is not currently structured with talent and capacity to deploy technology to broaden the tax base. Here are some facts:
Corporate Tax % |
VAT% |
Pak/BD Mult. |
|
Pakistan |
32* |
17 |
|
Singapore | 17 |
7
|
|
Sri Lanka |
15 |
12 |
|
Bangladesh | 25 |
15
|
|
Vietnam |
22 |
10 |
The tax regime also does not encourage capital formation and consolidation. Undistributed reserves are taxed at 10%, bonus shares at 5% super tax is levied at 3% for corporates & 4% for banking companies, and inter-corporate dividends taxed at 12.5% A Pakistan Business Council inspired government task force recommendation was enacted in 2007 to promote holding companies. Regretfully for a mere Rs. 2 Bn of tax revenue, this was repealed in a retrogressive manner, rendering pure holding companies pointless.
Efforts to formalize the real estate sector and to bring those not filing tax returns into the tax base are to be applauded. However, serial amnesties and reliance on withholding taxes are not long term solutions. The Rs. 21 Bn collected last year by way of withholding tax at 0.4% on banking transactions of non-filers palls against the Rs. 5 Trillion of transactions that it was derived from. Unless FBR is able to locate potential tax payers and enforce the writ of law, there will be no significant expansion of the tax base.
It is recognized that without sufficiently strong political will, none of the reforms suggested would work.
Misuse of Afghan Transit Trade and smuggling from Iran need to be curbed. Duty on transit goods should be charged at point of entry for refund on exit. Specific duty structure (by unit/ weight/ pieces/size) will reduce under-invoicing. Importers be made to file tax returns, to prevent abuse of the “full and final” tax regime.
Simplify laws and address silo management of ministries, federation & provinces to ease/reduce cost of doing business. Multiple taxes/agencies be replaced with a unitary collection system. Remove powers in the Companies Ordinance 2016 which overlap with/are in the domain of other authorities and will needlessly encumber corporates, the pillar of the formal sector.
There is growing fragmentation of authority between federal ministries which are increasingly operating in silos. Trade is a case in point:
Pakistan ranks poorly in virtually every global ranking, in many cases well below its immediate neighbors, who also don’t fare well:
Fragmentation of authority creates complexity for business. A simpler, technology-driven, one-window operation would considerably ease doing business and bring down the cost. A unified taxation return and collection system would save time, effort and money. Multiple agencies and authorities of the federal and provincial governments are responsible for tax collection in Pakistan. In the city of Karachi a medium sized enterprises needs to pay 47 different federal, provincial and local taxes (vs. 25 in India and 5 in Singapore). Due to complexity and multiple taxes and agencies, Pakistan stands at 155 of 190 countries in the World Bank/PwC Paying Taxes Ranking.
The Companies Ordinance 2016 (now rejected) duplicated power and authority of other bodies, placing further burden on the corporate, tax-compliant sector instead of making it easier to do business. For example, Section 452 requiring disclosure of foreign shareholdings overlaped with powers of the State Bank of Pakistan and the Federal Board of Revenue. Section 456 (2) (a) required real estate developers to seek SECP’s permission prior to announcement of projects, in addition to obtaining requisite sanctions, NOCs, etc., from authorities that regulate the real estate sector. These were non-value-adding duplications.
Transform the framework to promote the Information, Communications and Technology sectors to reposition Pakistan in the digital economy
For the longest time, Pakistan’s fiscal and other incentives for business have been focused on the manufacturing sector. If Pakistan is to position itself as a meaningful player in the growing digital economy, it needs to significantly improve the policy framework to encourage the ICT sector.
Broadband penetration in Pakistan is low. 1% through fixed lines and 16% via wireless compare poorly with OECD averages of 27% and 78% respectively. Whilst 3G/4G have contributed to raising wireless penetration, a key impediment is affordability. 83% of Pakistanis can’t afford broadband. Broadband cost is impacted by high taxes on equipment as well as mobile connectivity. It is burdened with taxes as high as 33%. In United States which has amongst the highest broadband penetrations in the world, the US House of Representatives in June 2015 passed the Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act (PITFA). This law bars federal, state and local governments from taxing household Internet subscriptions and from imposing discriminatory Internet-only taxes. The table below shows a direct relationship between tax rates and wireless penetration across multiple geographies:
Tax Rate |
3G Penetration |
|
Pakistan |
33% |
16%* |
India |
12% |
82% |
Sri Lanka |
28% |
80% |
Philippines |
12% |
140% |
Reduction in tax rates in other countries has proven to lead to more use, greater productivity and efficiency, higher GDP growth and improvement in social welfare. The net result over time is higher tax revenue. The UN’s International Telecommunications Union estimates that a 10% increase in broadband penetration leads to increase of 1.4% in GDP growth and the GSM Association feels that every 1000 new broadband subscribers leads to 33 direct and indirect jobs.
Affordable and reliable fixed line and wireless access to internet is fundamental to people’s empowerment and a key enabler of ICT. More inclusive and democratized web access will boost education, agriculture, health, mobile payments and e-commerce. Besides, it will boost employment, particularly of women, disseminate knowledge across a very wide spectrum of socially and economically relevant areas. There is an also acute need for government to deploy IT to simplify and make doing business easy. This is an opportunity for local software houses to develop or to partner global companies to digitize the government.
Fiscal investment incentives tailored for fixed asset intensive manufacturing sector are ineffective for intellectually-driven, asset lean ICT sector. Export earnings of the ICT sector, post the Finance Act 2016 attract tax at 3 to 4 times the rate applicable to export of goods. Aside from LUMS, UET and GIKI there are no quality training institutes. Software industry is unable to borrow to fund working capital needs because banks are reluctant to collateralize work-in-progress. In Philippines, the BPO industry employs a million people and generates $25 Bn of exports – larger than entire exports of goods and services from Pakistan! There are niche but significant opportunities to attract BPO to Pakistan. As India and China, the traditional centres of BPO have yet to implement the IFRS accounting standard which Pakistan has, there is a window of opportunity for outsourced accounting services. There is therefore considerable potential to generate jobs, exports and taxes from the ICT sector.
PBC is a business policy advocacy platform, established in 2005 by Pakistan’s leading private-sector businesses, including multinationals. Its objectives are to provide for the formation and exchange of views on the conduct of business in and from Pakistan, to promote and facilitate the integration of businesses in Pakistan into the world economy, to interact with governments in the economic development of Pakistan and to facilitate, foster and further the economic, social and human resource development of Pakistan. Its members, all from the private sector, are engaged in thirteen important sectors of manufacturing and services. They include 22 MNCs from 12 countries. Together, PBC members account of 10% of Pakistan’s GDP and nearly every fifth Rupee of annual tax and export revenues. Collectively, they directly employ 315,000 people, with millions more in the extended value chain. More information is available on www.pbc.org.pk.